Comments on: Survivor Samoa: Finale Results

By: Add

Add — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:03:11 +0000

This game is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO cheap! Hey should let us,the veiwers, decide who wins! THat game was all Russell’s, yet he lost to a no good coattailer!!!!! Boo Natalie!!!!

By: Phyllis

Phyllis — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:06:57 +0000

I see where Russell WILL BE BACK in Feb.He may stand a chanse if he plays it cool. He knows how to play the game but is a little to sure of his self. That is going to be a great season…can’t wait for it to start !!!!

By: Anthony Chipoletti

Anthony Chipoletti — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 09:30:08 +0000

Wikipedia Hurricane Katrina
QUOTE
At least 1,836 people lost their lives in the actual hurricane and in the subsequent floods..
UNQUOTE
NOW imagine you are a friend or family member of someone who died in New Orleans, and RussH does his little trick telling people his sad story THEN admitting to the WHOLE WORLD that he LIED, how FEEL GOOD do you need to be as a jury member to vote against RussH, this was NOT a FEEL GOOD jury, it was a jury who saw right through RussH as a LIAR and an egotist, NO ONE except Shambo was deceived by RussH, John simply voted AGAINST Galu because they decided to use John as bait, Shambo voted AGAINST Galu because she was paranoid and turned every Galu member against her BEFORE Galu lost Good Russell who DID hate Shambo and punished her severely, but Shambo TOOK revenge on the whole Galu tribe because of Good Russells stupid behavior of punishing Shambo and Good Russell punished himself nearly to death, Galu was doomed to begin with because Good Russell was not a wise leader, but Foa Foa had NO LEADER in Mick, so it comes down to who trusted who, NO ONE had ANY trust in RussH, not even Natalie or Mick, there were VERY FEW on camera moments when Natalie was shown trying to help RussH AVOID his own STUPID behavior toward the possible jury members, Natalie actually tried to HELP Russh to avoid making the jury angry, now imagine the jury voting FOR RussH because Natalie told them, just before the final vote, to vote for RussH because he played a good game, do you REALLY think the jury would vote for RussH because Natalie TOLD them to, then i have some dry land in New Orleans that i want to sell you…

By: missyae

missyae — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:37:40 +0000

I just think a jury is supposed to be fair and impartial and vote for the best player no matter what. They could have had Osama Bin Laden and Russell Hantz in front of them and the jury would have said Osama was better socially and gave him the money. It does not matter who was up there – Russell was going to lose. Now to me – thats just NOT a fair and impartial jury. I have nothing against Natalie – in fact I like her too and out of anyone else out there am glad it was her – but she didn’t play the better game – in my opinion. Thats one reason this show is so good – you never know whats going to happen. Todd – Brian – and Hatch all played sorta like Russell and they were respected for it and awarded the prize. This jury – led by Laura – was having none of that.

By: missyae

missyae — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:36:53 +0000

I just think a jury is supposed to be fair and impartial and vote for the best player no matter what. They could have had Osama Bin Laden and Russell Hantz in front of them and the jury would have said Osama was better socially and gave him the money. It does not matter who was up there – Russell was going to lose. Now to me – thats just a fair and impartial jury. I have nothing against Natalie – in fact I like her too – but she didn’t play the better game – in my opinion. Thats one reason this show is so good – you never know whats going to happen. Todd – Brian – and Hatch all played sorta like Russell and they were respected for it and awarded the prize. This jury – led by Laura – was having none of that.

By: Anthony Chipoletti

Anthony Chipoletti — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:30:22 +0000

missyae further PROOF that i am NOT BITTER like Russhs so called fans, I VOTED ON RUSSHs site RGS dot com FOR the charity NOT for RussHs SORRY insults of the JURY MEMBERS, no one votes for people THAT HATE, they vote for people they RESPECT, or rather people who respect THE JURYs RIGHT TO VOTE whoever THEY want to vote for, NOT who THINKS the jury SHOULD vote for them cuz EVERYONE thinks the jury should vote for them, especially if they are so self absorbed that they cannot imagine how insulting jurors would make them ANGRY

By: missyae

missyae — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:48:12 +0000

I cant really see Russell on Big Brother – The Amazing Race was interested in a pairing of Shambo and Russell. Shambo wants no part of any other reality tv shows. So maybe Russell can find another partner? He has a website open now – cant remember if it is http://www.russellgotscrewed.com or http://www.russellwasscrewed.com I think its the first one. Merry Christmas to everyone in this nice little place you have here!

By: Phyllis

Phyllis — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:39:19 +0000

WHAT A BUMMER!!!!! Russell SHOULD have won the game. He was the best PLAYER of all seasons!!! I really would like to see him back on the next season. He also would be great on the next Big Brother !!!!! Sure hope he reads all of these posts. Someone PLEASE tell Ressell he should go for Big Brother— that would be a show to watch!!! He would give all the players a run for their money !!!! GO RUSSELL !!!!!

By: April

April — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:25:53 +0000

I agree with most of you that the wrong person won. I really think I would have stopped watching this season if it wasn’t for Russell on the show. Everyone else was boring except for Shambo, she was a trip. I am a Russell fan even though I didn’t care for him too much in the beginning (lol).

By: Ashley

Ashley — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:13:08 +0000

very interesting missyae…